How does a repetitious topic imply the ability of a reader to discern content? Just because I can read about the nutrient uptake of basidiophytes or the mating strategies of Corvidae doesn’t mean that I read this material all of the time. I assure you, these readers you are both insulting have various levels of reading and interests — none of which implies their ability to be a “critical” reader. Perhaps the criticism of readers in general (along with the consistent boasting of the author in this case) needs to just stop.
You can see by the comments alone that there has been critical reading of this article alone.